A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature of Scopus Indexed Journals of Mathematical Creativity Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63230/jolabis.2.3.220Keywords:
Bibliometeric, Creativity Asessment, Literature Review, MathematicAbstract
Objective: Mathematical creativity plays a crucial role in enhancing the quality of life, resolving challenges, driving change, and improving the efficiency and effectiveness of systems. The objective of this study is to analyze publications from Scopus-indexed journals that investigate the effectiveness of techniques in estimating mathematical creativity. Method: This research is a literature review that utilizes bibliometric analysis in RStudio and the PRISMA technique. Results: This research emphasizes the efficacy of open-ended problem-solving and some frameworks in boosting mathematical creativity. It also uncovers the potential of augmented reality and cooperative learning methodologies in strengthening students' cognitive and creative abilities. Our in-depth study highlights the need for ongoing research and novel pedagogical practices to fully use the advantages of these techniques and instruments in promoting critical and creative thinking in mathematics education. Novelty: The uniqueness of this research lies in the development of a mathematical creativity instrument that integrates analogical and divergent thinking skills into a single measurement model. This instrument provides a more comprehensive assessment of creativity than conventional instruments that focus solely on mathematical knowledge.
References
Agoestanto, A., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Isnarto, I., & Rochmad. (2020). Analysis of mathematics modeling student ability in algebraic critical thinking and form of the scaffolding. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019) (Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 443, pp. 210–216). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.041
Agrawal, S., Oza, P., Kakkar, R., Tanwar, S., Jetani, V., Undhad, J., & Singh, A. (2024). Analysis and recommendation system-based on PRISMA checklist to write systematic review. Assessing Writing, 61, 100866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100866
Alimuddin, Ruslan, & Nashrullah. (2021). Effectivity of the mathematics learning model ICCACRE in developing mathematics creativity of junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899(1), 012129. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012129
Ardiansyah, A. S., Mulyono, Mashuri, Fiyanti, R. A., & Hamidah, F. S. (2021). CB-BL model (challenge based on blended learning) for mathematical creativity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4), 042065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042065
Atwany, M. Z., Sahyoun, A. H., & Yaqub, M. (2022). Deep learning techniques for diabetic retinopathy classification: A survey. IEEE Access, 10, 28642–28655. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3157632
Ayvaz, Ü., & Durmuş, S. (2021). Fostering mathematical creativity with problem posing activities: An action research with gifted students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100846
Bezerra, W. W. V., Gontijo, C. H., & Fonseca, M. G. (2021). Fostering mathematical creativity in the classroom through feedbacks. Acta Scientiae, 23(2), 88–112. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6213
Bicer, A., Lee, Y., Perihan, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2020). Considering mathematical creative self-efficacy with problem posing as a measure of mathematical creativity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09995-8
Bilgic, S., & Baloğlu, M. (2025). A bibliometric analysis of research on giftedness and mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 56(3), 382-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2236611
Bokhove, C., Xenos, M., & Mavrikis, M. (2023). Using social network analysis to gain insight into social creativity while designing digital mathematics books. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100497
Catarino, P., Vasco, P., Lopes, J., Silva, H., & Morais, E. (2019). Cooperative learning on promoting creative thinking and mathematical creativity in higher education. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educacion, 17(3), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2019.17.3.001
Dehaan, R. L. (2009). Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-12-0081
Arrahim, R. E. S., & Lestari, S. P. (2022). Strategi pembelajaran rotating trio exchange (RTE) terhadap hasil belajar matematika di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 5(2), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v5i2.4181
El Turkey, H., Karakok, G., Cilli-Turner, E., Satyam, V. R., Savić, M., & Tang, G. (2024). A framework to design creativity-fostering mathematical tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(8), 1761-1782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10449-3
Emre-Akdoğan, E. (2023). Examining mathematical creativity of prospective mathematics teachers through problem posing. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 42(2), 150-169. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrac006
Guo, Y., Lin, S., Williams, Z. J., Zeng, Y., & Clark, L. Q. C. (2023). Evaluative skill in the creative process: A cross-cultural study. Thinking skills and creativity, 47, 101240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101240
Haylock, D. W. (1985a). Conflicts in the assessment and encouragement of mathematical creativity in schoolchildren. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 16(4), 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739850160412
Haylock, D. W. (1985). High mathematical creativity in a pair of identical twins. The Journal of genetic psychology, 146(4), 557-560. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1985.10532476
Hensberry, K. K., & Jacobbe, T. (2012). The effects of Polya’s heuristic and diary writing on children’s problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(1), 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0034-7
Idris, N., & Nor, N. M. (2010). Mathematical creativity: Usage of technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1963–1967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.264
Jatiariska, I. G. A., Witraguna, K. Y., & Wijaya, I. K. W. B. (2022). Pendekatan matematika realistik berbasis pembelajaran daring pada siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 5(1), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.31949/jee.v4i1.3771
Kao, C. Y. (2022). How broad cognitive abilities contribute to traditional analogies, creative analogies, and general creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101068
Karafil, B., & Karakuyu, A. (2026). The mediating role of critical thinking in the relationship between creative thinking and reflective thinking. European Journal of Education, 61(1), e70360. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70360
Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4
Kwek, M. L. (2015). Using problem posing as a formative assessment tool. In F. M. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 273–292). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_13
Lamri, J., Valentini, K., Zamana, F., & Lubart, T. (2025). Creative work as seen through the ATHENA competency model. Behavioral Sciences, 15(11), 1469. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15111469
Long, H., Kerr, B. A., Emler, T. E., & Birdnow, M. (2022). A critical review of assessments of creativity in education. Review of Research in Education, 46(1), 288-323. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X221084326
Maher, C. A., Maher, J. A., Palius, M. F., & Wilkinson, L. C. (2023). Teachers attending to student reasoning: Do beliefs matter?. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 69, 101050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2023.101050
Mangas-Vega, A., Dantas, T., Merchán-Sánchez-Jara, J., & Gómez-Díaz, R. (2018). Systematic literature reviews in social sciences and humanities: A case study. Journal of Information Technology Research, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2018010101
Marrone, R., Cropley, D. H., & Wang, Z. (2023). Automatic assessment of mathematical creativity using natural language processing. Creativity Research Journal, 35(4), 661-676. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2131209
Mulawarman, A. V. (2024). Evaluation of digital project based blended learning model to improve students' critical thinking and problem solving skills. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 1875-1895. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4847
Omar, M., Karakok, G., Savic, M., Turkey, H. E., & Tang, G. (2019). I felt like a mathematician: Problems and assessment to promote creative effort. Primus, 29(1), 82-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2018.1475435
Pang, G., Cox, R. C., & Acheson, K. (2023). Assessing transformative learning in international education: Critiques and new directions based on a systematic review of literature. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2023(177), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20480
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
Rafi, I., & Retnawati, H. (2022). Exploring the use of portfolio assessment in fostering students mathematical creativity and self-regulated learning in an era of uncertainty. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2575(1), 040016, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0111225
Rahayuningsih, S., Sirajuddin, S., & Ikram, M. (2021). Using open-ended problem-solving tests to identify students’ mathematical creative thinking ability. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.66.8.3
Razak, A. A., Ramdan, M. R., Mahjom, N., Zabit, M. N. M., Muhammad, F., Hussin, M. Y. M., & Abdullah, N. L. (2022). Improving critical thinking skills in teaching through problem-based learning for students: A scoping review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(2), 342-362. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.2.19
Sadak, M., Incikabi, L., Ulusoy, F., & Pektas, M. (2022). Investigating mathematical creativity through the connection between creative abilities in problem posing and problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101108
Sak, U., Ayvaz, Ü., Bal-Sezerel, B., & Özdemir, N. N. (2017). Creativity in the domain of mathematics. In J. C. Kaufman, V. P. Glăveanu, & J. Baer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 276–298). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316274385.016
Singer, F. M., Voica, C., & Pelczer, I. (2017). Cognitive styles in posing geometry problems: Implications for assessment of mathematical creativity. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0820-x
Tall, D. (2014). Making sense of mathematical reasoning and proof. In Y. Li, & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 223–235). Springer.
Tan, M., Mourgues, C., Bolden, D. S., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2014). Making numbers come to life: Two scoring methods for creativity in Aurora's Cartoon Numbers. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.39
Verger, N. B., Roberts, J., Guiller, J., & McAloney‐Kocaman, K. (2024). Creativity research overlooks the study of resilience among young children: A bibliometric network review. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 58(1), 96-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.632
Wen, S. F., Shukla, A., & Katt, B. (2025). Artificial intelligence for system security assurance: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Security, 24(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-024-00959-0
Whittle, A., Vaara, E., & Maitlis, S. (2023). The role of language in organizational sensemaking: An integrative theoretical framework and an agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 49(6), 1807-1840. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221147295
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yang, B. (2023). From STEM to STEAM: The connections and fostering of creativity in STEAM. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 2(1), 441–446.
Yasemin, S., & Kadir, B. A. (2025). Mathematical creativity: A systematic review of definitions, frameworks, and assessment practices. Education Sciences, 15(10), 1348. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101348
Ying, H., Wu, Z., Geng, Y., Wang, J., Lin, D., & Chen, K. (2024). Lean workbook: A large-scale lean problem set formalized from natural language math problems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37, 105848-105863. https://doi.org/10.52202/079017-3357
Zainudin, M., Subali, B., & Jailani. (2019). Construct validity of mathematical creativity instrument: First-order and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12336a
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Law and Bibliometrics Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
