Flow of Mental Activity in Developing Dominant Representations for Solving Convergent Sequence Problems: Supporting Quality Education (SDG 4)

Authors

  • Nursupiamin Nursupiamin UIN Datokarama Palu Author
  • Sukayasa Sukayasa Universitas Tadulako Author
  • Muh. Rizal Universitas Tadulako Author
  • Muhammad Ikram Universitas Negeri Makassar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63230/jocsis.2.2.161

Keywords:

Convergent sequences, Dominant representation, Mathematical understanding, Mental activity, Quality education (SDG 4)

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the flow of mental activities involved in developing dominant representations when solving convergent sequence problems and to understand how students transform dominant representations into alternative forms to support mathematical understanding. Method: Employing a qualitative case study approach involving 12 Mathematics Education students from the Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Datokarama State Islamic University, Palu, who had completed real analysis courses and understood the concept of convergent sequences. Data were collected through validated tests and semi-structured interviews. The research procedure followed the stages proposed by Fraenkel et al., including phenomenon identification, participant selection, data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Results: The findings revealed that the flow of mental activities in developing dominant representations consists of five stages: understanding the problem, identifying dominant representations, converting dominant representations into alternative representations, evaluating and revising solutions, and reflecting on the effectiveness of the chosen representations. Students with verbal, visual, and symbolic dominant representations demonstrated different approaches in solving convergent sequence problems but followed a similar cognitive flow when transforming representations. Novelty: A systematic flow of mental activities for developing dominant representations in mathematical problem-solving. The findings contribute to mathematics education literature by explaining how representation transformation supports conceptual understanding of convergent sequences and promotes more effective learning practices aligned with the goals of quality education (SDG 4).

References

Afriyani, D., Sa’dijah, C., & Muksar, M. (2018). Characteristics of Students’ Mathematical Understanding in Solving Multiple Representation Task Based on Solo Taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(3), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3920

Amerstorfer, C. M., & Freiin, C. (2021). von Münster-Kistner: Student perceptions of academic engagement and student-teacher relationships in problem-based learning. Front. Psychol. 12, 713057 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057

Awaludin, A. A. R., Selvia, N., & Andrari, F. R. (2021). Mathematical representation of students in solving mathematic problems reviewed from extrovert-introvert personality. International Journal of Elementary Education, 5(2), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v5i2.33206

Awofala, A. O. A., Bazza, M. B., Akinoso, S. O., Olaguro, M., Fatade, A. O., & Arigbabu, A. A. (2024). Approaches to learning as determinants of senior secondary school students’ achievement in mathematics. SN Social Sciences, 4(11), 190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-024-00987-6

Bartle, R. G., & Sherbert, D. R. (2000). Introduction to real analysis (Vol. 2). Wiley New York.

Beccone, S. (2020). Creative thinking and insight problem-solving in Keats “When I have fears….” Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1760186. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1760186

Bingham, T. (2017). Writing Activities to Conceptualize Math Concepts. Texas Association for Literacy Education Yearbook, 4, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/hea.12082_34

Brata, D. P. N., Utomo, E. S., & Hartiningrum, E. S. N. (2022). Peningkatan pengetahuan penilaian sikap berbasis profil pelajar Pancasila di SMPN 1 Wonosalam. Jurnal ABM Mengabdi, 9(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.31966/jam.v9i2.1117

Çetin, N. (2009). The performance of undergraduate students in the limit concept. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(3), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802568119

Cooper, J. L., & Alibali, M. W. (2012). Visual representations in mathematics problem-solving: effects of diagrams and illustrations. North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Ekawati, R., Kohar, A. W., Imah, E. M., Amin, S. M., & Fiangga, S. (2019). Students’ cognitive processes in solving problem related to the concept of area conservation. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.6339.21-36

Huinker, A. E. (2020). American woodcock habitat selection and reproductive success in Michigan. Michigan State University.

Isnani, Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, & Wardono. (2020). Analysis of mathematical creativity in mathematics learning is open ended. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1), 12102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012102

Jones, J. P., & Tiller, M. (2017). Using concrete manipulatives in mathematical instruction. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 45(1), 18–23.

Juliyanto, E., & Siswanto, S. (2021). An analysis of thinking patterns of natural sciences teacher candidate students in understanding physics phenomena using P-Prims perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(2), 22043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/2/022043

Kartika, E. D., Cipta, D. A. S., & Rohmah, L. N. (2021). Pengembangan REALQU untuk Memaksimalkan Kemampuan Pembuktian Matematis Berdasarkan Adversity Quotient. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i1.3357

Mainali, B. (2021). Representation in teaching and learning mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1111

Man, Y. L., Asikin, M., & Sugiman, S. (2022). Systematic literature review: Students' mathematical representation ability in mathematics learning. Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v10i1.26821

Netti, S., & Mastuti, A. G. (2021). Characteristics representation of equation mathematics problems solving in students. Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 9(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.33477/mp.v9i1.1866

Novianti, M., & Retnawati, H. (2019). Student-teacher’s perception of mathematical representation in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1320(1), 12106. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012106

Nurmala, V., Lidyasari, A. T., Nugroho, I. A., Adi, B. S., & Kawuryan, S. P. (2024). Learning the Value of Character Education from Indonesian Animation Series: Adit & Sopo Jarwo. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 7(1), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i1.65484

Nursupiamin, N. (2020). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Mahasiswa Ditinjau Dari Cara Kerja Otak Yang Dominan. Koordinat Jurnal MIPA, 1(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.24239/koordinat.v1i1.2

Pedersen, M. K., Bach, C. C., Gregersen, R. M., Højsted, I. H., & Jankvist, U. T. (2021). Mathematical representation competency in relation to use of digital technology and task design—a literature review. Mathematics, 9(4), 444. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9040444

Rosmala, D., & Setyaningsih, V. (2021). Classroom English learning activities: Students’ facial expressions with a focus on interpersonal meanings. TLEMC (Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts), 5(2), 221–234.

Royden, H. L., & Fitzpatrick, P. M. (2010). Real analysis 4th Edition. Printice-Hall Inc, Boston.

Santos-Trigo, M. (2024). Problem solving in mathematics education: Tracing its foundations and current research-practice trends. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01578-8

Schoenherr, J., & Schukajlow, S. (2024). Characterizing external visualization in mathematics education research: A scoping review. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01494-3

Shah, R. K. (2019). Effective constructivist teaching learning in the classroom. Online Submission, 7(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i4.600

Simbolon, N., Nasution, S., & Mawengkang, H. (2018). Understanding the concept of mathematics and mathematical representation in mathematics teaching. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 6(4), 5062–5068. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2018.4825

Sokolowski, A. (2018). The Effects of Using Representations in Elementary Mathematics: Meta-Analysis of Research. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(3), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.3.08

Uyen, B. P., Tong, D. H., Loc, N. P., & Thanh, L. N. P. (2021). The effectiveness of applying realistic mathematics education approach in teaching statistics in grade 7 to students’ mathematical skills. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.82.185.197

Wang, S., & Han, C. (2021). The influence of learning styles on perception and preference of learning spaces in the university campus. Buildings, 11(12), 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11120572

Wewe, M. (2020). The profile of students’ learning difficulties in concepts mastery in calculus course. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 3(2), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v3i2.6421

Yumiati, & Haji, S. (2019). Promoting understanding ability of semigroup concept through learning model of concept attainment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), 12089. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012089

Zulu, M. W., & Mudaly, V. (2023). Unveiling problem-solving strategies of pre-service mathematics teachers: A visual and discursive exploration. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2299. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13344

Published

2026-06-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Flow of Mental Activity in Developing Dominant Representations for Solving Convergent Sequence Problems: Supporting Quality Education (SDG 4). (2026). Journal of Current Studies in SDGs, 2(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.63230/jocsis.2.2.161