Social Dynamics of Conflict over the Construction of a House of Worship in Cilegon City: Implications for Inclusive Governance and SDG 16

Authors

  • Eva Hutri Sinaga Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University Author
  • Ahmad Sihabudin Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University Author
  • Ail Muldi Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63230/jocsis.3.2.175

Keywords:

Conflict Resolution, Inclusive Governance, Interfaith Dialogue, Religious Freedom, SDG 16, Social Conflict, Worship House Construction

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the social dynamics underlying the conflict over the construction of the HKBP Maranatha Church in Cilegon City, identify the social and political factors that intensified the conflict, and examine the role of local government in facilitating conflict resolution. The study also considers the relevance of inclusive governance and peaceful conflict management to Sustainable Development Goal 16.  Method: This research employed a descriptive qualitative approach using a case study design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and document analysis involving representatives of local government institutions, religious organizations, community groups, and parties directly affected by the conflict. The data were analyzed thematically and validated through source triangulation and member checking. Results:  The findings indicate that the conflict was shaped by prejudice, interreligious distrust, unequal access to decision-making, political intervention, and ambiguity in the implementation of government regulations. The local government performed several roles as mediator, facilitator, collaborator, controller, and monitor. However, the effectiveness of these roles was constrained by inconsistent institutional responses and unequal power relations between majority and minority religious groups.  Novelty: This study integrates structural conflict, symbolic interpretation, and local governance perspectives to explain how religious symbols, power inequalities, and administrative procedures interact in conflicts over houses of worship. It demonstrates that transparent regulation, inclusive dialogue, and equitable participation are essential for strengthening peaceful institutions in accordance with SDG 16.

References

Amal, M. K. (2020). Towards a deliberative conflict resolution? A reflection on state inclusive response to Sunni–Shi’a tension in Indonesia’s democracy. QIJIS: Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies, 8(2), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v8i2.7146

Armawi, A. (2013). Kajian penguatan Komunitas Intelijen Daerah. Mimbar Hukum, 25(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16110

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Cilegon. (2022). Kota Cilegon dalam angka 2.

Berman, P. S. (2012). Global legal pluralism: A jurisprudence of law beyond borders. Cambridge University Press.

BBC News Indonesia. (2022). Pendirian gereja ditolak: Penantian 15 tahun jemaat, warganet pertanyakan langkah wali kota, “Inikah namanya toleransi?”. BBC News Indonesia.

Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social conflict. Free Press.

Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford University Press.

Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J. R., Arico, S., Báldi, A., Bartuska, A., Baste, I. A., Bilgin, A., Brondizio, E., Chan, K. M. A., Figueroa, V. E., Duraiappah, A., Fischer, M., Hill, R., . . . Zlatanova, D. (2015). The IPBES Conceptual Framework—Connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002

Deutsch, M., & Coleman, P. T. (2000). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice. Jossey-Bass.

Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Cilegon. (n.d.). SIKECIL. Demographic database.

Faqih, A. (2021). The role of Forum Kerukunan Umat Beragama (FKUB) for religious harmony and the rights of freedom of religion or belief (FoRB). Religió: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 11(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.15642/religio.v11i1.1662

Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton University Press.

Herrman, H., Patel, V., Kieling, C., Berk, M., Buchweitz, C., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A., Kessler, R. C., Kohrt, B. A., Maj, M., McGorry, P., Reynolds, C. F., III, Weissman, M. M., Chibanda, D., Dowrick, C., Howard, L. M., Hoven, C. W., Knapp, M., Mayberg, H. S., . . . Wolpert, M. (2022). Time for united action on depression: A Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission. The Lancet, 399(10328), 957–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02141-3

Honka, H. (1996). Harmonization of contract law through international trade: A Nordic perspective. Tulane European and Civil Law Forum, 11, 111–184. https://doi.org/10.37381/8s2ygq32

Hotimah, H., & Nurhayati, N. (2024). Penolakan pembangunan rumah ibadah di Kota Cilegon dalam konteks regulasi dan moderasi beragama. Wawasan: Jurnal Kediklatan Balai Diklat Keagamaan Jakarta, 5(1), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.53800/wawasan.v5i1.297

Indriani, R. M. D. (2022). 5 fakta penolakan pembangunan gereja di Cilegon, FKUB ungkap alasannya. Suara.com.

Iqbal, M. (2022, September 12). FKUB Cilegon jelaskan awal mula polemik penolakan gereja. DetikNews.

Kusuma, A., Adriyanto, A., & Syamsunasir. (2022). Jalan damai Pemerintah Kota Bogor dalam eskalasi konflik 15 tahun rumah ibadah GKI Yasmin. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 22(3), 1480–1485. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v22i3.2357

Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. United States Institute of Peace Press.

McCrudden, C. (2008). Human dignity and judicial interpretation of human rights. European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 655–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043

Munawaroh, I., & Kudus, W. A. (2023). Intoleransi agama bagi kehidupan masyarakat minoritas di Kota Cilegon–Banten. Edu Sociata: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi, 6(1), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.33627/es.v6i1.1156

Nugroho, K. S., Rahayu, R., Adnan, M., & Warsono, H. (2022). The arrangement of Indonesian religious harmony: Lessons from Cilegon, Banten. Journal of Governance, 7(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v6i3.13811

Pambudi, C. E. (2017). Peran Walikota Bekasi dalam penyelesaian konflik antar kelompok umat beragama: Studi konflik pembangunan Gereja Santa Clara, Bekasi Utara.UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Institutional Repository.

Riansyah, A., Mulyani, M., Al-Giffari, M. F., Akbar, S. F., & Hulailah, S. (2021). Faktor penolakan pembangunan gereja oleh masyarakat di Kota Cilegon. International Journal of Demos, 3(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v3i1.79

Riswanda, Hikmawan, M. D., Ramadhan, G., & Nurrohman, B. (2020). Making sense of the politics of recognition: Indicators of religious tolerance in Banten, Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 13(11), 3386–3397. https://doi.org/10.37624/IJERT/13.11.2020.3386-3397

Regus, M. (2022). Centering acculturation as an approach to challenging the fragility of human rights in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 6(2), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v6i2.31150

Rozikin, I., Suradinata, E., Mulyati, D., & Achmad, M. (2025). Narrative politics and the limits of religious governance in decentralized Indonesia: The case of HKBP Maranatha in Cilegon, Indonesia. Penamas, 38(1), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.31330/penamas.v38i1.830

Saptohutomo, A. P. (2022, September 11). Kasus penolakan gereja di Cilegon, Imparsial minta kepala daerah tak diskriminasi kelompok minoritas. Kompas.com.

Sazali, H., Guntoro, B., Subejo, & Partini. (2015). Penguatan toleransi agama: Analisis komunikasi pembangunan agama (Studi Pemerintahan Kota Bogor). Profetik: Jurnal Komunikasi, 8(2), 37–50.

Wahyudin, W. (2022). Mengurai polemik penolakan pendirian gereja di Cilegon. Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia.

Published

2026-07-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Social Dynamics of Conflict over the Construction of a House of Worship in Cilegon City: Implications for Inclusive Governance and SDG 16. (2026). Journal of Current Studies in SDGs, 3(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.63230/jocsis.3.2.175