Teaching Literature, Teaching Values, and Advancing SDG 4: A Case Study of UNESCO Core Values in an Indonesian Islamic University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63230/jocsis.2.3.236Keywords:
UNESCO core values, literature teaching, values education, religiosity, character education, higher education, literary learningAbstract
Objective: To investigate lecturers’ and students’ views of UNESCO core values in literature teaching and to examine how these values are manifested in literary learning at a Muhammadiyah University in East Java, Indonesia. Method: Employing a qualitative case study design involving three literature lecturers and thirty-one undergraduate students. Data were collected through questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, literary analysis activities, field notes, and document analysis. Results: The findings show that both lecturers and students strongly support the integration of UNESCO core values into literature teaching. Among the eight UNESCO core values, religiosity emerged as the most dominant value, reflecting the institutional philosophy of Muhammadiyah education. The values were integrated through literary analysis, classroom interaction, teaching materials, and lecturers’ role modeling. Literature classrooms also promoted empathy, tolerance, responsibility, compassion, and social awareness while maintaining literary appreciation and critical inquiry. Novelty: Offering a novel contribution by examining the integration of UNESCO Core Values into literature teaching within an Indonesian Islamic higher education context, demonstrating how literature can function as a vehicle for values-based education while advancing Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education), particularly Target 4.7, which emphasizes education for sustainable development, global citizenship, cultural diversity, and the promotion of peace and human values. The findings extend the discourse on holistic education by illustrating how literary learning fosters students’ literary competence, ethical awareness, character development, and social responsibility within a faith-based university setting.
References
Akrim, A., & Gunawan, G. (2021). Quranic storytelling approach as educational model to teach religious values in the Indonesian context. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 21(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2021.1.005
Basthomi, Y. (2003). Theoretical views underlying the selection of classroom activities: Paying attention to the classroom of English literature in EFL context. TEFLIN Journal, 14(2), 279–291.
Chien, C.-F., & Liao, C.-J. (2021). From learning literature to online holistic education: University students’ experiences in value-based learning. Holistic Education Review, 2(1), 1–8.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Goodwyn, A. (2012). The status of literature teaching and learning in schools. Changing English, 19(1), 1–12.
Murti, W., & Maya, S. (2021). The effectiveness of environmental learning model on students’ motivation and learning outcomes. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 24(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2021v24n2i8
Niam, Z. W. (2019). Konsep Islam Wasathiyah sebagai wujud Islam Rahmatan lil ‘Alamin: Peran NU dan Muhammadiyah dalam mewujudkan Islam damai di Indonesia. Palita: Journal of Social Religion Research, 4(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.24256/pal.v4i2.764
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Permanaludin, U. (2017). Strategies of English literature teaching at English Literature Undergraduate Program at Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University. Al-Tsaqafa: Jurnal Ilmiah Peradaban Islam, 14(1), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-tsaqafa.v14i1.1799
PP Muhammadiyah. (2015). Tanfidz keputusan muktamar Muhammadiyah ke-47. Berita Resmi Muhammadiyah, 36.
Prahaladaiah, D. (2021). Value-based teaching English language and literature. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 2, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2021.2.59.66
Seymour, M., Thanos, T., Newell, G. E., & Bloome, D. (2020). Teaching literature using dialogic literary argumentation. Routledge.
Sidhu, G. K., & Fook, C. Y. (2010). Instructional practices in teaching literature: Observations of ESL classrooms in Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 54–63.
Singh, B. (2019). Character education in the 21st century. Journal of Social Studies, 15(1), 1–12.
Spirovska, E. (2019). Reader-response theory and approach: Application, values and significance for students in literature courses. SEEU Review, 14(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2019-0003
Straughan, R. (1988). Can we teach children to be good? Basic issues in moral, personal and social education. Routledge.
Sukiman, S., Suyatno, S., & Yap, S. N. K. (2021). Revitalizing love and compassion values education at religious education learning in national curriculum in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 18(2), 331–352.
Suwadi, S. (2021). The value of education in literature and relevance for teaching. EDUTEC: Journal of Education and Technology, 5(2), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.29062/edu.v5i2.316
UNESCO. (2002). Learning to be: A holistic and integrated approach to values education for human development. UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education.
Wallace-Wells, D. (2019). The uninhabitable earth: A story of the future. Penguin.
Widdowson, H. G. (1984). Explorations in applied linguistics 2. Oxford University Press.
World Health Organization. (2015). World report on ageing and health. WHO.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Yumashev, A., Kondrashev, S., Mikhaylov, A., & Ślusarczyk, B. (2020). Global indicators of sustainable development: Evaluation of the influence of the human factor. Energies, 13(1), 259.
Zapata, A., Sánchez, L., & Robinson, A. (2016). Examining young children’s envisionment building responses to postmodern picturebooks. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 18(4), 439–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798416674253
Zarro, M. (2020). Muhammadiyah sebagai gerakan Islam dan pendidikan. FACTUM: Jurnal Sejarah dan Pendidikan Sejarah, 9(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.17509/factum.v9i1.21503
Zimmer, Z., Jagger, C., Chiu, C. T., Ofstedal, M. B., Rojo, F., & Saito, Y. (2016). Spirituality, religiosity, aging and health in global perspective: A review. SSM – Population Health, 2, 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.04.009
Ziolkowski, E. (2021). Literature and religion. In The Wiley Blackwell companion to the study of religion (pp. 44–64).
Zhu, X., & Li, J. (2019). Classroom culture in China: Collective individualism learning model. Springer Nature.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Current Studies in SDGs

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
