Advancing SDG 4 through Contextual Robotics Learning Devices to Enhance Technical and Problem-Solving Skills in Vocational Education

Muhamad Zuhrie; Agus Wiyono; Fendi  Achmad; Dwi  Aqidah; Afrizal Luthfi Eka  Arnatha; Muhammad Nawwarudin  Nawwarudin

doi:10.63230/jocsis.2.4.235

Authors

Muhamad Zuhrie State University of Surabaya Author
Agus Wiyono Author
Fendi Achmad State University of Surabaya Author
Dwi Aqidah State University of Surabaya Author
Afrizal Luthfi Eka Arnatha State University of Surabaya Author
Muhammad Nawwarudin Nawwarudin State University of Surabaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63230/jocsis.2.4.235

Keywords:

Contextual Teaching, Problem-Solving Skills, Research and Development, Robotics, Vocational Education

Abstract

Objective: To development of a comprehensive robotics learning device package for vocational engineering education based on Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) principles. This research contributes to Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4) by promoting quality education through innovative, contextual, and competency-based learning approaches that support technical skill development and problem-solving abilities. Method: The research employed a Research and Development (R&D) methodology guided by the 4-D model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate) and the ADDIE framework. The developed learning package consists of six components: Mechanical Robot Module, Electronics Robot Module, Software Robot Module, Student Worksheets (LKPD), Learning Evaluation Instruments, and Robotics Practicum Guide. Validation was conducted by experts, followed by initial student trials to evaluate feasibility and learning responses. Results: Expert validation across seven aspects resulted in an average feasibility score of 86.6%, categorized as Very Feasible. Initial student trials demonstrated positive responses, showing improvements in learning engagement, module attractiveness, instructional interactivity, and robotics skills through contextual project-based problem-solving activities. The developed learning package achieved an overall research achievement rate of 90.6%. Novelty: The study provides a novel contribution by integrating CTL principles into a comprehensive robotics learning device package that connects theoretical knowledge with real-world industrial applications. The findings highlight how contextual technology-based learning supports SDG 4 by strengthening quality vocational education, enhancing student competencies, and preparing learners for industry-oriented challenges.

References

Abuhassna, H., Adnan, M. A. B. M., & Awae, F. (2024). Exploring the synergy between instructional design models and learning theories: A systematic literature review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), Article ep499. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14289

Ahmad, J., & Noor, M. S. A. M. (2023). The funds of identity approach in creating storybooks for deaf pupils. Malaysian Journal of Action Research, 1(1), 54–81.

Azevedo, S. O., Bezerra, J. E., & Miranda, L. C. de. (2017). A methodology of contextualized educational robotics. In 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–9). IEEE.

Batra, R., Song, L., & Ramprasad, R. (2021). Emerging materials intelligence ecosystems propelled by machine learning. Nature Reviews Materials, 6, 655–678. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-020-00255-y

Bross, B., Wang, Y.-K., Ye, Y., Liu, S., Chen, J., Sullivan, G. J., & Ohm, J.-R. (2021). Overview of the Versatile Video Coding (VVC) standard and its applications. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 31(10), 3736–3764. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2021.3101953

Budhwar, P., Chowdhury, S., Wood, G., Aguinis, H., Bamber, G. J., Beltran, J. R., Boselie, P., Cooke, F. L., Decker, S., DeNisi, A., Dey, P. K., Guest, D., Knoblich, A. J., Malik, A., Paauwe, J., Papagiannidis, S., Patel, C., Pereira, V., Ren, S., . . . Varma, A. (2023). Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(3), 606–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12524

Carvalho, D. V., Pereira, E. M., & Cardoso, J. S. (2019). Machine learning interpretability: A survey on methods and metrics. Electronics, 8(8), Article 832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics8080832

Efendi, A. (2018). Pengembangan media “Agus Trainer” untuk pembelajaran robotika. Edutic: Scientific Journal of Informatics Education, 5(1), 32–38.

Holzinger, A., Saranti, A., Angerschmid, A., Retzlaff, C. O., Gronauer, A., Pejaković, V., Medel-Jiménez, F., Krexner, T., Gollob, C., & Stampfer, K. (2022). Digital transformation in smart farm and forest operations needs human-centered AI: Challenges and future directions. Sensors, 22(8), Article 3043. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22083043

Khanlari, A. (2016). Robotics integration to create an authentic learning environment in engineering education. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.

Lameras, P., & Arnab, S. (2022). Power to the teachers: An exploratory review on artificial intelligence in education. Information, 13(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13010014

Moor, M., Banerjee, O., Shakeri Hossein Abad, Z., Krumholz, H. M., Leskovec, J., Topol, E. J., & Rajpurkar, P. (2023). Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature, 616, 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05881-4

Mosqueira-Rey, E., Hernández-Pereira, E., Alonso-Ríos, D., Bobes-Bascarán, J., & Fernández-Leal, Á. (2023). Human-in-the-loop machine learning: A state of the art. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56, 3005–3054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10246-w

Nguyen, T., Graham, I. D., Mrklas, K. J., Bowen, S., Cargo, M., Estabrooks, C. A., Kothari, A., Lavis, J., Macaulay, A. C., MacLeod, M., Phipps, D., Ramsden, V. R., Renfrew, M. J., Salsberg, J., & Wallerstein, N. (2020). How does integrated knowledge translation compare to other collaborative research approaches to generating and translating knowledge? Learning from experts in the field. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18, Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-0539-6

Nori, H., King, N., McKinney, S. M., Carignan, D., & Horvitz, E. (2023). Capabilities of GPT-4 on medical challenge problems [Preprint]. arXiv.

Nurhadi, Yasin, B., & Senduk, A. G. (2004). Pembelajaran kontekstual: Contextual teaching and learning dan penerapannya dalam KBK (2nd ed.). Universitas Negeri Malang Press.

Rodriguez-Sanchez, C., Orellana, R., Barbosa, P. R. F., Borromeo, S., & Vaquero, J. (2024). Insights 4.0: Transformative learning in industrial engineering through problem-based learning and project-based learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(4), Article e22736. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22736

Rusconi, L., & Squillaci, M. (2023). Effects of a universal design for learning training course on the development of teachers’ competences: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 13(5), Article 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050466

Savaengkan, O., & Chaijaroen, S. (2026). Revolutionizing vocational education: Implementing a web-based constructivist model to enhance industrial and problem-solving skills. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 16(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-02-2025-0052

Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022). A comparative study of the ADDIE instructional design model in distance education. Information, 13(9), Article 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402

Sumarni, W., & Kadarwati, S. (2020). Ethno-STEM project-based learning: Its impact on critical and creative thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21754

Wahyudi, W., & Amiruddin, A. (2023). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran sistem robotika berbasis mikrokontroler di era industri 4.0. Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan, 11(1), 70–70.

Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of artificial intelligence in the classroom: The relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3

Wang, W., Coutras, C., & Zhu, M. (2021). Empowering computing students with proficiency in robotics via situated learning. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1).

Wargadinata, W., Maimunah, I., Dewi, E. M. P., & Rofiq, Z. (2020). Students’ responses on learning in the early COVID-19 pandemic. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 5(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v5i1.6153

Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538

Zuhrie, M. S., Basuki, I., & Anifah, L. (2017). Design of an artificial intelligence robot as a tool for teaching media based on contextual teaching and learning. SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología.

Zuhrie, M. S., Basuki, I., Asto, B., & Anifah, L. (2018). Design of smart educational robot as a tool for teaching media based on contextual teaching and learning to improve the skill of electrical engineering student. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 336, Article 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/336/1/012047

Zuhrie, M. S., Basuki, I., & Anifah, L. (2019). Analysis of robotic building skill for electrical engineering student based on contextual teaching and learning with structural equation modelling. In Proceedings of the Conference (pp. 360–367).

Zuhrie, M. S., Munoto, Buditjahjanto, I. G. P. A., Anifah, L., & Hasanah, N. (2020). Learning tool for robotics basic programming based on contextual teaching and learning to improve problem-solving skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 26(1), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v26i1.27559