Advancing SDG 4 through Deep Learning Approaches: Reconstructing Student Learning from Metacognitive and Higher-Order Thinking Skills Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63230/jocsis.2.4.248Keywords:
Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Higher Education, Metacognition, Sustainable Education, SDG 4, Transformative LearningAbstract
Objective: To reconstruct student learning within the context of sustainable quality education by exploring the integration of deep learning approaches, metacognition, and Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in higher education. The study responds to the persistent dominance of memorization-oriented and procedural learning practices that limit students’ cognitive development and lifelong learning capacities. Methods: A qualitative conceptual design was employed using thematic analysis of scholarly literature published between 2022 and 2026. Relevant studies on deep learning, metacognition, HOTS, and sustainable higher education were systematically reviewed to identify key themes and conceptual relationships. Results: The analysis demonstrates that deep learning promotes meaningful cognitive engagement, reflective awareness, and active knowledge construction. Metacognitive regulation functions as a central mechanism linking deep learning and HOTS through planning, monitoring, and evaluating learning processes. Furthermore, inquiry-based learning, reflective activities, and authentic problem-solving experiences enhance students’ analytical reasoning, creativity, adaptability, and critical thinking, which are essential competencies for sustainable learning and future workforce readiness. Novelty: The proposes an integrated conceptual framework that connects deep learning, metacognition, and HOTS within the broader agenda of Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education). The framework offers a comprehensive perspective for transforming student learning from surface-level knowledge acquisition to meaningful and reflective learning, while providing theoretical insights for educators and researchers seeking to promote sustainable and transformative educational practices in higher education.
References
Abelha, M., Fernandes, S., Mesquita, D., Seabra, F., & Ferreira-Oliveira, A. T. (2020). Graduate employability and competence development in higher education: A systematic literature review using PRISMA. Sustainability, 12(15), 5900. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155900
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2021). What is qualitative in qualitative research? Qualitative Sociology, 44(4), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-021-09497-w
Aydın, S., & Demirer, V. (2023). The role of metacognitive awareness in higher education learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100245
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Biggs, R., de Vos, A., Preiser, R., Clements, H., Maciejewski, K., & Schlüter, M. (Eds.). (2021). The Routledge handbook of research methods for social-ecological systems. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003021339
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1982). Learning, remembering, and understanding (Technical Report No. 244). Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://hdl.handle.net/2142/17511
Chen, Y., & Lien, H. (2022). Deep learning approaches and conceptual understanding in higher education. Education Sciences, 12(9), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12090611
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
Dinsmore, D. L., & Zoellner, B. P. (2022). Metacognition in higher education: Current trends and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1125–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09631-8
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 10(2), Article 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Kar, A. . (2022). Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. International Journal of Information Management, 63, Article 102456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., Drummy, M., & Gardner, M. (2023). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Corwin.
Huang, R., Spector, J. M., & Yang, J. (2023). Deep learning and meaningful learning experiences in digital higher education. Computers & Education, 191, 104-648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104648
Kim, S., & Cross, T. (2024). Higher-order thinking skills and deep learning engagement among university students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101456
Li, X., Zhao, L., & Wang, Y. (2024). Project-based learning and deep learning competencies in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 21(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.21.1.04
Luckin, R. (2022). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.
Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2023). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Nguyen, T. H., Tran, P. T., & Le, M. Q. (2023). Metacognitive regulation and higher-order thinking in deep learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 11215–11234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11652-4
OECD. (2023). Education policy outlook 2023: Empowering all learners to go green. OECD Publishing.
Panadero, E. (2023). A review of self-regulated learning and metacognition in educational research. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09708-8
Rahman, A., Yusuf, M., & Hidayat, R. (2024). Fostering higher-order thinking skills through reflective learning environments in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(2), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2023-0345
Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Castillo-Martínez, I. M., & Sanabria-Z, J. (2023). Digital learning ecosystems and deep learning competencies in higher education. Sustainability, 15(7), 34-59. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075934
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (2022). Metacognitive theories revisited: Implications for learning and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 70, 102083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102083
Sulaiman, T., Ismail, S. N., & Aziz, A. A. (2023). Inquiry-based learning and the development of higher-order thinking skills among university students. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16113a
Tang, K., Lee, J., & Chen, P. (2025). Technology-enhanced learning environments for developing higher-order thinking skills in higher education. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100211
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2024). Monitoring SDG 4: Quality education and lifelong learning opportunities for all. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
Wang, H., & Huang, Y. (2025). Reflective learning ecosystems and cognitive engagement in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2024.2314567
Zhao, Q., & Sullivan, P. (2024). Deep learning pedagogies and student engagement in contemporary universities. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(3), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2261189
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Starčič, A. I., Spector, M., Liu, J., Jing, Y., & Li, Y. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021, Article 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Current Studies in SDGs

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
