Context-Responsive Managerial Skills and Character-Centred School Quality: Implications for SDGs 4, 16, and 17 in Eastern Indonesia

Remigius Missa; Maria Veronika  Roesminingsih; Bambang Sigit  Widodo

doi:10.63230/jocsis.3.1.316

Authors

Remigius Missa State University of Surabaya Author
Maria Veronika Roesminingsih State University of Surabaya Author
Bambang Sigit Widodo State University of Surabaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63230/jocsis.3.1.316

Keywords:

Character-Centred School Quality, Managerial Skills, Multi-Site Case Study, School Leadership, Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract

Objective: To examines how principals integrate conceptual, human, and technical managerial skills to strengthen school quality across three Catholic secondary schools in Eastern Indonesia and interprets the relevance of these practices to SDGs 4, 16, and 17. Method: A multi-site case study was conducted in three schools governed by the same foundation but differentiated by mission, resources, and performance conditions. Purposively selected participants represented principals, vice-principals, teachers, and foundation leadership; the source documentation did not provide one consolidated participant total. Data from in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentary analysis were examined within each site through condensation, display, and conclusion drawing, followed by cross-site comparison and triangulation. Results: Conceptual skill was expressed through school self-evaluation, SWOT analysis, vision and mission review, priority setting, and the alignment of school work plans and budgets. Human skill mobilised implementation through motivation, dialogue, active listening, recognition, delegation, stakeholder participation, and partnership building. Technical skill embedded priorities in instructional supervision, curriculum and assessment coordination, teacher development, remedial and enrichment support, learning-resource management, discipline, and accountable administration. Across the sites, these skills operated as a recursive improvement process. School quality combined standards compliance and academic and non-academic performance with integrity, character, faith, civic responsibility, local wisdom, and social trust. Novelty: The study advances Katz’s framework from a three-part taxonomy to a context-responsive improvement mechanism and offers a character-centred conception of school quality for faith-based and resource-differentiated settings, while linking the findings analytically-not as original field indicators—to the governance principles of SDGs 4, 16, and 17.

References

Anand, G., Atluri, A., Crawfurd, L., Pugatch, T., & Sheth, K. (2023). Improving school management in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Economics of Education Review, 97, 102464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102464

Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1858119

Boyce, J., & Bowers, A. J. (2018). Toward an evolving conceptualization of instructional leadership as leadership for learning: Meta-narrative review of 109 quantitative studies across 25 years. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-06-2016-0064

Brauckmann, S., Pashiardis, P., & Ärlestig, H. (2023). Bringing context and educational leadership together: Fostering the professional development of school principals. Professional Development in Education, 49(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1747105

Bush, T. (2007). Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy, and practice. South African Journal of Education, 27(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC32136

Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680

Cansoy, R., Gümüş, S., & Walker, A. (2025). Challenges in implementing instructional leadership: Insights from Turkish school principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(5), 991–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241263915

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Dahlgaard, J. J., Khanji, G. K., & Kristensen, K. (2008). Fundamentals of total quality management. Routledge.

Daniëls, E., Hondeghem, A., & Dochy, F. (2019). A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings. Educational Research Review, 27, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.003

Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863

Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2000). Developing comparative and international educational leadership and management: A cross-cultural model. School Leadership & Management, 20(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430050011461

Dutta, V., & Sahney, S. (2016). School leadership and its impact on student achievement: The mediating role of school climate and teacher job satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(6), 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2014-0170

Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., Bailes, L. P., & Nichols, R. (2019). From school leadership to differentiated instruction: A pathway to student learning in schools. The Elementary School Journal, 120(2), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1086/705827

Government of Indonesia. (2021). Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 57 of 2021 concerning National Education Standards (as amended by Government Regulation Number 4 of 2022).

Gümüş, S., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2020). The relationship between professional development and school principals’ leadership practices: The mediating role of self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(7), 1155–1170. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2019-0380

Gümüş, S., Bellibaş, M. Ş., Esen, M., & Gümüş, E. (2018). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216659296

Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652

Hitt, D. H., & Tucker, P. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315614911

Hsieh, C.-C., Tai, S.-E., & Li, H.-C. (2024). Impact of school leadership on teacher innovativeness: Evidence from multilevel analysis of Taiwan TALIS 2018. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 835–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2397040

Juharyanto, J., Sultoni, S., Arifin, I., Bafadal, I., Nurabadi, A., & Hardika, H. (2020). “Gethok Tular” as the leadership strategy of school principals to strengthen multi-stakeholder forum role in improving the quality of one-roof schools in remote areas in Indonesia. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020924374

Karadağ, E., & Sertel, G. (2026). The effect of educational leadership on students’ achievement: A cross-cultural meta-analysis research on studies between 2006 and 2024. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 54(4), 1255–1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432251327645

Katz, R. L. (1974). Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, 52(5), 90–102.

Kulophas, D., & Hallinger, P. (2020). Leadership that matters: Creating cultures of academic optimism that support teacher learning in Thailand. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-12-2019-0222

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Liebowitz, D. D., & Porter, L. (2019). The effect of principal behaviors on student, teacher, and school outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 89(5), 785–827. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319866133

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher professional learning in China: Testing a mediated-effects model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 501–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769048

Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.023

Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403039003005

Mazhabi, Z. (2026). Investigating leadership attributes and strategies during times of crisis and educational change: A story of public primary school principals in Lombok, Indonesia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 54(4), 1310–1345. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241300280

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

Missa, R. (2023). Keterampilan manajerial peningkatan mutu sekolah: Studi multi situs pada tiga SMA Yasukda Flores Nusa Tenggara Timur [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Surabaya].

Özdemir, N. (2020). How to improve teachers’ instructional practices: The role of professional learning activities, classroom observation and leadership content knowledge in Turkey. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(6), 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2019-0189

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.

Qian, H., & Walker, A. (2021). Creating conditions for professional learning communities (PLCs) in schools in China: The role of school principals. Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 586–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1770839

Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408324829

Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006). School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(3), 798–822. https://doi.org/10.2307/20054196

Sallis, E. (2002). Total quality management in education (3rd ed.). Kogan Page.

Shen, J., & Wu, H. (2025). The relationship between principal leadership and student achievement: A multivariate meta-analysis with an emphasis on conceptual models and methodological approaches. Educational Administration Quarterly, 61(2), 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X241286527

Shen, J., Wu, H., Reeves, P., Zheng, Y., Ryan, L., & Anderson, D. (2020). The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100357

Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720508984678

Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.

Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2012). Transformational school leadership effects on student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(4), 418–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2012.681001

Talebizadeh, S. M., Hosseingholizadeh, R., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between principals’ learning-centered leadership and teacher professional learning: The mediation role of trust and knowledge sharing behavior. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100970

Tan, C. Y. (2024). Influence of principal leadership across contexts on the science learning of students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09828-2

Tan, C. Y., Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2024). How school leadership practices relate to student outcomes: Insights from a three-level meta-analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(1), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211061445

Tan, C. Y., Gao, L., & Shi, M. (2022). Second-order meta-analysis synthesizing the evidence on associations between school leadership and different school outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220935456

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1).

Walker, A., & Hallinger, P. (2015). A synthesis of reviews of research on principal leadership in East Asia. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(4), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2015-0038

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.