Artificial Intelligence in Physics Learning for Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis

Authors

  • Hanan Zaki Alhusni Universitas Negeri Surabaya Author
  • Riski Ramadani Universitas Negeri Surabaya Author
  • Hanan Zaki Alhusni Universitas Negeri Surabaya Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6695-3731
  • Titin Sunarti Universitas Negeri Surabaya Author
  • Madlazim Madlazim Universitas Negeri Surabaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63230/jolabis.1.3.95

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Bibliometric Analysis, Deep Learning, Education for Sustainable Development, Physics Education

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to map the global research landscape on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in physics education within the framework of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) using a bibliometric approach. The objective is to identify publication trends, key contributors, collaborative networks, and emerging themes that define the development of this research domain. Method: The analysis was based on 4,814 documents retrieved from the Scopus database for the period 2015–2025. Data preprocessing included deduplication and keyword harmonization. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using performance indicators (publication output, influential authors, journals, countries, institutions) and science mapping (co-authorship, co-occurrence, co-citation) with VOSviewer and Bibliometrix. Results: Findings reveal three phases of publication dynamics: initial emergence (2015–2018), growth (2019–2021), and accelerated expansion (2022–2024), with a peak in 2024. The United States dominates global output, followed by China and Indonesia. Physics-focused journals such as Physical Review Physics Education Research and Journal of Physics: Conference Series serve as major outlets. Co-authorship networks show a core cluster in Europe and North America, while Asian and Global South researchers are increasingly active. Thematic mapping highlights clusters on AI-enabled assessment, machine learning, Large Language Models (LLMs), and sustainability-oriented physics education. Novelty: This paper provides a systematic overview of the intellectual structure and thematic evolution of AI-based physics education for ESD. It identifies gaps, including limited cross-country collaboration, low experimental validation, and uneven global participation, while highlighting opportunities for ethical, inclusive, and sustainability-aligned AI integration in future physics learning.

References

Akcayir, M., & Akcayir, G. (2018). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002

Akhmadieva, R. S., Udina, N. N., & Kosheleva, Y. P. (2023). Artificial intelligence in science education: A bibliometric review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), e460. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13587

Alhusni, H. Z., Iswardani, A., Sunarti, T., Saphira, H. V., & Kurtuluş, M. A. (2025). Trends, Methods, and Perspectives of Education Curriculum in Indonesia Towards the Quality and Outcomes of Physics Learning Using the Bibliometric Approach. Journal of Law and Bibliometrics Studies, 1(1), 41-41. https://doi.org/10.63230/jolabis.1.1.41

Aoulkadi, I., Poll, S., & Frank, E. (2025). Artificial intelligence in sustainable development research: A bibliometric perspective. Nature Sustainability, 12(1), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01000-x

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2020). Augmented reality in education—cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International, 57(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1730196

Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G., Cohen, M., Diaz, L., Doucette-Remington, S., … Zint, M. (2021). Key competencies in sustainability in higher education—toward an agreed-upon reference framework. Sustainability Science, 16(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2

Chakraborty, S., & Venkatakrishnan, A. (2022). Leveraging machine learning for concept change in physics education: A systematic review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 15(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2021.3112482

Chen, N.-S., et al. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. Educational Technology & Society, 25(2), 13–34.

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and common sense. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1438047

Crawford, J., et al. (2021). The AI effect: A review of artificial intelligence and psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050752

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Fuller, L., et al. (2022). AI-enabled formative assessment in science: A literature mapping. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 990–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1891882

Goralski, M. A., & Tan, T. K. (2023). Artificial intelligence and sustainable development: The global crossroads. Sustainability, 15(13), 10112. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310112

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Healy, L., et al. (2021). Using AI-driven analytics to support personalized learning in physics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(4), 522–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00243-8

Henze, J., Bresges, A., & Becker-Genschow, S. (2024). AI-supported data analysis boosts student motivation and reduces stress in physics education. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.20951

Holmes, W., & Gardner, J. (2020). E-learning: Concepts and practice. SAGE.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Kodilia, P., et al. (2018). Learning in physics: Can virtual reality simulations change students’ views of conceptual understanding? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 010115. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010115

Kortemeyer, G. (2023). Large language models in physics education: Opportunities and challenges. The Physics Teacher, 61(7), 511–514. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0148364

Larbi, R., Kasri, L. A., Alami, N., & Akioud, M. (2025). Impact of artificial intelligence for sustainable development in higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6422-005-4_45

López-Pérez, M. V., et al. (2023). Program adoption of AI tools in STEM teaching: Trends and barriers. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11958-7

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.

Mahligawati, F., Allanas, E., Butarbutar, M. H., & Nordin, N. A. N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in physics education: A comprehensive literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2596, 012080. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2596/1/012080

Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Henriksen, D. (2011). The seven transdisciplinary habits of mind: Extending the TPACK framework toward 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 51(2), 22–28.

Nouri, J., & Schaper, N. (2021). Mobile augmented reality in physics education: A bibliometric study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 953–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09818-0

Physics Teaching Research. (2025). Physics instructors’ acceptance and implementation of generative AI in physics education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21, 010155. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010155

Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holmes, W., & Nemorin, S. (2024). The ethics of AI in education. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.11842

Prayogi, S., & Verawati, N. (2024). Physics learning technology for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A literature study. International Journal of Ethnoscience and Technology in Education, 1(2), 155–191. https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v1i2.12316

Quinn, D., et al. (2016). The impact of open educational resources in science education. Science Education International, 27(3), 214–226.

Reich, J. (2020). Will AI and robotics exacerbate or ameliorate educational inequality? Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(1), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.169

Rodríguez-Abitia, G., & García-Sánchez, J.-N. (2021). Mobile augmented reality to facilitate learning on energy in physics classes. Computers & Education, 163, 104083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104083

Sahar, R., & Munawaroh, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Bibliometric and content analysis for future research agenda. Discover Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44229-025-00080-3

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Traxler, J. (2020). Mobile learning in STEM education: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-0205-6

UNESCO. (2021). Artificial intelligence and education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709

Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Fuso-Nerini, F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11, 233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14108-y

Wan, Y., & Chen, X. (2024). Large language models for formative assessment in physics education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 010114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010114

Yeadon, W., & Hardy, T. (2023). The impact of AI in physics education: A comprehensive review from GCSE to university levels. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.05163

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Published

2025-12-08

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Artificial Intelligence in Physics Learning for Education for Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Analysis. (2025). Journal of Law and Bibliometrics Studies, 1(3), 95. https://doi.org/10.63230/jolabis.1.3.95